LeDoux Lab 2010 SfN Abstracts
 
Program#/Poster#: 914.15/MMM31
Title: Hebbian and neuromodulatory mechanisms act synergistically to instruct associative memory formation
Location: Halls B-H
Presentation Time: Wednesday, Nov 17, 2010, 3:00 PM - 4:00 PM
Authors: *J. P. JOHANSEN1, H. HAMANAKA2, L. DIAZ-MATAIX2, J. E. LEDOUX2,3;
1Ctr. for Neural Sci., New York Univ., NEW YORK, NY; 2Ctr. for Neural Sci., New York Univ. New York, NY 10003, USA, New York, NY; 3Orangeburg, Nathan S. Kline Inst. for Psychiatric Res., New York, NY
Abstract: Fear conditioning is a form of associative learning in which organisms acquire defensive responses to sensory stimuli that predict impending danger. The lateral nucleus of the amygdala (LA) is a site of associative plasticity for fear memory storage and it is generally believed that this results from a Hebbian process whereby US-evoked depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons instructs plasticity at synapses formed by weaker, coactive CS inputs onto the same neurons. However, other theories of synaptic plasticity suggest that memory storage is engaged through activation of multiple processes including Hebbian mechanisms (depolarization) combined with neuromodulatory influences (Bailey et al, 2000). To test whether depolarization of LA neurons is sufficient as a US to produce fear learning we expressed the light activated channelrhodopsin (ChR2) specifically in LA pyramidal neurons using an adeno-associated viral vector. We then paired an auditory CS with direct laser light stimulation of LA pyramidal neurons as a US, in the absence of a peripheral shock US. This training regimen produced fear conditioning but was not optimal as standard training conditions (3 CS-US pairings) produced no fear learning while large numbers of pairings resulted in low levels of conditioning. However, when conditioning was performed with a dual US that included weak footshock (which alone produced little conditioning) in combination with laser depolarization of LA pyramidal neurons specifically during the US period, supra-additive levels of fear conditioning occurred (compared with laser stimulation or weak shock alone). This effect was blocked if a noradrenergic ?-receptor (?-AR) antagonist (propanolol, 0.12 ug in 0.3 uL) was infused into the LA prior to conditioning, suggesting that the weak shock US contributed to fear conditioning by stimulating ?-ARs in the LA. To directly test this hypothesis we infused a ?-AR agonist (isoproteronol, 1.5 ug in 0.3 uL) into the LA and then performed fear conditioning by pairing the auditory CS with the laser stimulation US in the absence of a footshock US. Whereas neither the ?-AR agonist nor laser stimulation US alone produced learning, combined laser stimulation and ?-AR activation did produce fear memory formation. These findings demonstrate that conjoint depolarization of LA pyramidal cells (as a US) and LA ?-AR activation is sufficient to reinforce fear conditioning and support the idea that associative memory formation is governed by a multi-process model in which both Hebbian and neuromodulatory processes are essential.
Support: NRSA fellowship F32-MH082505
NIH grant R01-MH46516