LeDoux Lab 2012 SfN Abstracts
 
Program#/Poster#: 603.03/EEE6
Title: c-fos activation in PFC following threat correlates positively with instrumental actions and negatively with Pavlovian reactions.
Location: Hall F-J
Presentation Time: Tuesday, Oct 16, 2012, 10:00 AM -11:00 AM
Authors: *R. C. MARTINEZ1,2, N. GUPTA2, G. LAZARO-MUNOZ2, R. SEARS2, J. OTOCH3, J. LEDOUX2,4, C. K. CAIN2,4;
1Sao Paulo, Brazil; 2New York Univ., New York, NY; 3Univ. de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; 4Nathan S. Kline Inst. for Psychiatric Res., Emotional Brain Inst., Orangeburg, NY
Abstract: Performance of instrumental active avoidance (AA) is constrained by Pavlovian defensive reactions such as freezing. It has been noted that a substantial number of animals fail to acquire avoidance responses and instead exhibit abnormally high rates of freezing. Our previous work has shown that poor avoiders have a deficit mainly in performance, not learning, as lesions that eliminate freezing immediately rescue AA responding without further training. This work seeks to expand the understanding of the neural circuits that contribute to the competition between instrumental and Pavlovian responses with AA training. For that we evaluate the pattern of c-Fos expression in periaqueductal gray, striatum, prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens (shell and core) and hippocampus 90-minutes after a shock-free Sidman AA test for both good- and poor-performing rats. c-Fos activation was observed in all regions compared to box controls, however, activation was significantly higher in both prelimbic and infralimbic cortex for good performers compared to poor AA performers. In both prefrontal regions, c-fos expression correlated positively with AA responding and negatively with freezing. We previously found similar effects in specific subregions of the amygdala, namely the dorsal part of lateral amgydala, the anterior part of medial amygdala, and the lateral part of central amygdala. Thus, this unbiased approach suggests that prefrontal cortex and amygdala may play important, coordinated roles in the competitive selection of defensive actions vs reactions in threatening situations.
Support: LIM 26 - HCFMUSP
K05 MH067048
R37 MH038774
R01 MH046516
K05 MH067048