PhD program
The following FAQ answers are in part based on the excellent
FAQ page by Yael Niv, but were modified to describe my lab.
Q: Should I apply to the Neuroscience program or the Cognition and Perception (Psychology) program?
My lab is part of both programs, so to work with me, either is fine. However,
- If you are primarily interested in understanding human behavior, Psychology might be the better choice. If you are primarily interested in understanding the brain, then Neuroscience.
- Students in the Neuroscience program are not admitted to work with a specific professor; they are admitted to the program at large and are free to work with whomever they find a good match with once they arrive. By contrast, students in the Cognition and Perception program get admitted directly to a specific lab.
- When accounting for the housing stipend in Neuroscience, Neuroscience students get paid about $9000 a year more than Cognition and Perception students. This is quite unfair but I don't know what to do about it. In the lab, I typically partially make up for the difference.
Q: What are the admission criteria?
Your application will typically be evaluated by professors whose interests are close to yours. When I have to do an initial evaluation of an application, I pay attention to:
- Your GPA. I will particularly pay attention to whether you took advanced quantitative courses (in math, physics, computer science, or statistics) and how well you did in those.
- Your GRE (where applicable). I personally care only about your quantitative GRE, as long as you can communicate in English.
- Your research experience. Strong applicants have worked in at least two labs for enough time to feel ownership of their project.
- Your reference letters. Letters from research advisors count for much more than letters from course instructors, unless you went far above and beyond expectations in the course.
- Your interests. There needs to be a good match with my lab (if you apply to Cognition and Perception) or with several labs (if you apply to Neuroscience). It is ok if you do not know exactly what you want to work on - you shouldn't make up a research interest that you aren't sure of.
- Your statements. I typically look for an ability to reflect on what you have done, to put it into perspective, and to see connections. Don't just describe what you have done (or worse, copy/paste abstracts from your projects).
In both programs, eventual admission decisions are made by a program committee, not by an individual professor.
Q: If I were to be accepted, can you provide funding for my studies?
Yes. All full-time PhD students admitted to the lab are guaranteed funding for the normal time of completion of their degree. This money comes from various sources including student scholarships, teaching assistantships, central university funds for student support, and research grants. The details of where your support comes from should not be of concern to you.
Q: Should I approach you in advance to ask if you accept any students next year?
Not if you apply to the Neuroscience program. Students in the Neuroscience program are not admitted to work with a specific professor; they are admitted to the program at large and are free to work with whomever they find a good match with once they arrive. By contrast, students in the Cognition and Perception program get admitted directly to a specific lab. Therefore, it is more important to establish contact with me around the time you apply. I often Skype with Cognition and Perception applicants shortly after they apply (in December or January). I might, however, still not know for sure whether I will accept students.
Q: Why would I apply to your lab instead of to a similar lab somewhere else?
- Each lab is unique. Among labs worldwide studying human decision-making using computational approaches, my lab might be a bit different in its breadth (from basic visual illusions to social decision-making) and in its emphasis on methodology (for example, we developed Bayesian adaptive direct search).
- The broader research environment is important. Both PhD programs have many other professors/labs working on decision-making and/or computation (see for example Computational Cognitive Science at NYU and the Training Program in Computational Neuroscience), which means that it is easier to take relevant courses, easier to have academic interests in common with your fellow PhD students, and easier to establish collaborations across labs.
- Both programs encourage that you gain teaching experience by being a teaching assistant in an undergraduate course.
- The broader environment also includes mentorship initiatives, such as the Growing up in Science mentorship series.
- Being in New York City means easy access to courses at other universities (through the Inter-University Doctoral Consortium), to internships in industry, to artistic collaborations (for example in the intersection of science and art, which many students and faculty take advantage of), and to opportunities for outreach and advocacy (for example through the Neuroscience Outreach Group at NYU, braiNY, or the Scientist Action and Advocacy Network). My lab in particular encourages engaging with society.