Robert Shapley
Visual physiology and perception
After graduating from Harvard, concentrating in Chemistry and Physics,
I obtained a PhD degree from Rockefeller University in
neurophysiology and biophysics. My thesis research was on the random firing
rate of eccentric cells in the eye of the horseshoe crab, Limulus.
H.K. Hartline, who received the Nobel Prize for
Medicine and Physiology a year after I arrived in his lab as a graduate student, was my PhD adviser.
Hartline was famous for being the first person to record nerve impulses
from single visually responsive cells and he instilled the value of
single-unit recording for studying the nervous system.
Then with a Helen Hay Whitney Fellowship I went to Northwestern
to work with Christina Enroth-Cugell on cat retinal ganglion cells.
The second half of the Whitney Fellowship was spent at Cambridge University
in the labs of Fergus Campbell and John Robson, studying
with David Tolhurst how humans detect edges. After that, I returned to
Rockefeller as Assistant Professor, and then became Associate
Professor, investigating retinal signal processing in many different
vertebrates: cats, eels, frogs, monkeys. One happy memory is
when I received a MacArthur Fellowship, in 1986.
Moved on in 1987 to the newly
formed NYU Center for Neural Science where I have studied the visual cortex
and perception.
Our ultimate goal is to relate the neuronal activity in the
visual cortex to visual perception and to use V1 as a model system that
reveals fundamental processes of the cerebral cortex.
Building realistic models of the cortex is an important goal. This is the
path that Math Professors David McLaughlin and Michael Shelley,
from the NYU Courant Institute, and I have followed: to construct
realistic neural network models of the visual cortex.
The model of the visual cortex we have developed
is a recurrent excitatory and inhibitory network. The model
needs strong cortical inhibition to explain many phenomena
in visual cortex, for instance the existence of
simple and complex cells, orientation selectivity and other
feature selectivities, and spectral peaks in the cortical local field potential.
We found that the cortical network generates spectral peaks
in the model and in the
real cortex. This led us to study the dependence of spectral peaks in the
local field potential (LFP) on the contrast and the geometry of the visual stimuli
that elicit cortical activity. Andy Henrie initiated this line of research
in our laboratory. We found a smooth graded emergence of gamma-band oscillations
with increasing contrast as shown in the figure.
The gamma-band peak in the spectrum is more often evident in
the LFP than in single-unit activity. In fact I learned from this work that
the single-unit approach, pioneered by my PhD adviser H.K. Hartline, could be
greatly enhanced by studying population activity with the LFP simultaneously
with single cell activity, and we are pursuing this now.
Another line of research has been how color is represented in the visual system
from the eye to the visual cortex. With Elizabeth Johnson, Mike Hawken and I found that
there were double-opponent cells in the cortex that were spatially tuned
for orientation and spatial frequency but that were equally sensitive to pure-color
and to black-white patterns. The double opponent cells make the cortex
sensitive to color boundaries. An illustration of this color edge-sensitivity is
shown in the color-bullseye figure that is a color version of the Chevreul illusion.
The color shading of the rings is created by your perception because
the rings are physically uniform in color. The sensitivity of double-opponent
cells for color boundaries enables the visual system to discount somewhat
the variations of the color of illumination. This is why color perception
depends more on the surface properties of objects than on illumination.
E-mail: shapley@cns.nyu.edu
Complete CV and bibliography
[ pdf ]
Some Past and Recent Publications
Hochstein S and Shapley R (1976) Linear and nonlinear spatial
subunits in Y cat retinal ganglion cells. J.Physiol 262, 265-284
[ pdf ]
Shapley R and Victor JD (1978) The effect of contrast on the
transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells,
J.Physiol 285, 275-298
[ pdf ]
Shapley R and Enroth-Cugell C (1984) Visual Adaptation and
Retinal Gain Controls, Progress in Retinal Research, vol. 3,
ed. N. Osborne and G. Chader, Pergamon, London, p. 263-346
[ pdf ]
Ringach D Shapley R (1996) Spatial and temporal properties of
illusory contours and amodal boundary completion
Vision Research, 36, 3037-3050
[ pdf ]
Ringach D Hawken M and Shapley R (1997) Dynamics of
orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex. Nature 387,
281-284.
[ pdf ]
Sceniak MP Ringach DL Hawken MJ, and Shapley R (1999) Contrast's
effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.
Nature Neuroscience 2, 733-739
[ pdf ]
Wielaard J Shelley M Mclaughlin DM Shapley RM (2001)
How Simple Cells Are Made in a Nonlinear Network Model of
the Visual Cortex J Neurosci. 21:5203-5211
[ pdf ]
Johnson EA Hawken MJ Shapley RM (2001) The Spatial
Transformation of Color in the Primary Visual Cortex of
the Macaque Monkey, Nature Neuroscience 4: 409-16
[ pdf ]
Ringach D Shapley RM and Hawken MJ (2002) Orientation
selectivity in macaque V1: diversity and laminar dependence.
J. Neurosci. 22:5639-5651
[ pdf ]
Shelley M McLaughlin D Shapley R and Wielaard, J (2002)
States of high conductance in a large-scale model of the visual
cortex J. Computational Neurosci. 13, 93-109
[ pdf ]
Kang K Shapley RM Sompolinsky H (2004) Information tuning of
populations of neurons in primary visual cortex.
J Neurosci. 24:3726-35
[ pdf ]
Henrie JA, Shapley R. (2005) LFP power spectra in V1 cortex:
the graded effect of stimulus contrast J Neurophysiol 94:479-90
[ pdf ]
Xing D Shapley RM, Hawken MJ. Ringach DL (2005) The effect of
stimulus size on the dynamics of orientation selectivity in
Macaque V1 J Neurophysiol 94:799-812
[ pdf ]
Williams PE Shapley RM (2007) A Dynamic Nonlinearity and Spatial
Phase Specificity in Macaque V1 Neurons J. Neurosci 27: 5706-5718
[ pdf ]
|